MentionedOn
Which local businesses AI assistants actually recommend.
Latest published snapshot — 25,220 AI answers across 1,261 leaderboards, 21 trades, and 40 U.S. cities.
Automation with the evidence left in · Sacramento and Northern California
Most AI implementations fail. We will not sell you one of those.
We research the hours first. If nothing is worth building, we say so and you pay nothing. If one workflow clears the bar, we define the success gate and the human exception path before code or money changes hands.
- Cost to inspect the research
- $0
- Call required
- No
- First paid build
- From $5,000
Proof you can inspect
Two live products. Two observable problems.
This is the public evidence roster. Both products publish a dataset and methodology so the headlines can be challenged.
Inspect product and evidence
Intakra
Which public company events create a grounded reason to act now.
Latest published snapshot — 1,253 public signals across 806 watched companies, with sources attached.
Fictional example · not a client result
Inspect the evidence boundary before sharing an email.
This construction dossier shows how Soxoa keeps observed facts, planning assumptions, ranges, limits, and the pilot gate separate. Every figure is illustrative and challengeable.
Observed
Facts in the source record
- Occupied healthcare renovation is a named service line.
- Six project managers support active delivery.
- The portfolio includes phased, live-site projects.
Boundary
What public research cannot prove
- Public research does not reveal current project count or document volume.
- The assessment has not verified the project-management system or loaded labor rates.
Receipts
Dated source notes
Lists occupied healthcare renovations, tenant improvements, preconstruction, and closeout services.
Planning range
Capacity value, not guaranteed savings
Low, likely, and high are model outputs for this fictional company. Measure Low Likely High Hours / week 18 28 41 Annual value $30,240 $47,040 $68,880 Method
Shared calculation rules
- 48 working weeks per year
- $35 loaded hourly cost
- Capacity value, not guaranteed cash savings
- Low / likely / high totals combine three separately bounded workflows
Assumptions
Inputs that still require discovery
- 90-140 inbound items across active projects each week.
- Current intake and routing averages 4-7 minutes per item.
- Eight superintendents complete four logs per week.
- Drafting and photo sorting currently consumes 20-35 minutes per log.
- Six project managers prepare weekly updates for one to three active jobs.
- Assembly and reconciliation takes 30-50 minutes per update.
Recommended first project
RFI and submittal intake triage
It is frequent, bounded, measurable, and improves downstream review without asking project managers to surrender approval authority.
Bounded scope: Run one active project and two document types through a monitored intake queue; integrate only after classification accuracy and exception handling pass review.
Planning timeline: 3-4 weeks
Success gate
85%+ correct classification, zero lost source documents, and at least seven coordinator hours reclaimed per week.
How it works
Five steps. One measurable decision.
This is the same process described on our full process page and in the assessment itself.
- 01
Research before we talk
We study your operation, hiring, and tools to identify where repetitive work is consuming measurable time.
- 02
A free, specific assessment
You receive a private assessment link with observed facts, explicit assumptions, opportunity ranges, and limitations.
- 03
Review it without a call
Read the evidence on your own time. If the opportunity is too small or automation is the wrong answer, we say so.
- 04
Scope one bounded pilot
If you want to proceed, a 30-minute working session sets the success gate, human review path, fixed scope, and price.
- 05
Deploy, test, and hand off
We integrate one workflow, test it on real output, document the exceptions, and measure it against the agreed gate.
The house rule
Automation is not always the answer. We will tell you when it is not.
Who you work with
You work directly with the person who builds it.
John Arndt
Founder, Soxoa
Every engagement starts with real research. You get a complete picture of where your team is losing time, a system built to fix the worst of it, and support until it is actually working. No decks. No theory.
Checkable, today
What we can actually show you today
No client logos and no case studies, because there is nothing we can publish that you could verify. Here is what you can check instead.
Two products running in public
MentionedOn and Intakra are live, and each publishes its dataset and methodology so the headline numbers can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Inspect the products and their evidenceThe output, before you are a customer
The assessment format is published in full as fictional worked examples: observed facts separated from assumptions, ranges rather than promises, and the limitations named.
Read a complete examplePREVIOUSLY: PayPal, Cloudflare, Inscribe
Where John Arndt worked before Soxoa: twelve years deploying technology inside those companies. This is employment history, not a customer list.
A registered California company
Soxoa LLC was registered with the California Secretary of State on April 2, 2025, and operates as a service-area business out of Sacramento, CA.
Free assessment
See what we find before you talk to anyone.
Share your company, website, and email. We return a private assessment with sources, assumptions, ranges, and one recommended pilot. No call is required to read it.
We do not run third-party marketing analytics on this form or the public site.
Straight answers
The claims, with the hedge up front.
Is the assessment a sales call?
No. The form requests the research. We email a private assessment link when it is ready, usually within 24 hours. A call is optional after you have read it.
Are the examples client case studies?
No. The public examples are fictional planning models. They show the evidence standard, assumptions, ranges, and pilot gates we use; they are not claims about real companies.
What if automation is not worth it?
Then that is the recommendation. Automation is not always the answer, and we will tell you when the hours or risk do not justify a build.
What does a build cost?
The assessment is free. Fixed-scope Quick-Win Builds start at $5,000 only after the workflow, success gate, and exception path are clear.